Skip to content

Content and exam-integrity policy

Allowed content

  • Original explanations, summaries, diagrams, and labs.
  • Public objective mappings with links to canonical sources.
  • Independently authored scenario and practice questions.
  • Short attributed quotations when legally appropriate.
  • Links to public documentation, books, courses, videos, repositories, and labs.
  • Factual resource metadata such as format, access model, update date, and known coverage gaps.

Prohibited content

  • Questions, answers, diagrams, or choices remembered from a live exam or renewal assessment.
  • Braindumps, VCE files, scraped question banks, leaked items, or sources marketed as actual exam questions.
  • Copied chapters, slides, transcripts, labs, illustrations, or substantial passages from paid training.
  • Republished practice-test content obtained through a purchase or subscription.
  • Customer, employer, or proprietary material.
  • Secrets, credentials, personal data, or private repository content.
  • Branding that implies vendor or training-provider endorsement.

AI-generated content

Every generated page must state that it is an independent AI-assisted resource, identify the canonical exam guide, show its generation/review state, and warn that the vendor source is authoritative.

AI-generated content may not enter the internal source-validated state—displayed publicly as Sources + objectives checked — human review pending—unless:

  • the official objectives are mapped;
  • all material factual claims have supporting sources;
  • volatile claims are labeled VERIFY CURRENT;
  • links and local references validate;
  • the content contains no prohibited exam material.

Supporting sources may be vendor, upstream-project, standards, named-expert, maintained-repository, or carefully evaluated independent sources. Only the current official blueprint can define exam identity and scope. Prefer current first-party documentation for product behavior; when it is missing or incomplete, non-vendor evidence must be cited and labeled Corroborated — verify current or Unconfirmed — validation needed according to docs/SOURCE-QUALITY.md. Passing source validation confirms that this evidence discipline was applied; it does not convert a third-party statement into an official vendor claim.

Training providers

Commercial and community resources may be linked and evaluated using their public landing pages. The project does not scrape authenticated areas or imply that paying for a source makes it authoritative.

Corrections and removals

Open an issue when content is inaccurate, outdated, improperly attributed, or potentially protected. When provenance is uncertain, remove the disputed material from publication until it can be established.